🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my life is archived on the platform, and now they demand us to pay for it."

Negative feedback and a sense of unfairness have dominated online discussion since the messaging service became the most recent tech firm to put a price tag on a feature that people previously accessed for free.

Snap announced in last month that it would start charging users if they have exceeding five gigabytes worth of previously shared photos and clips stored as the Memories feature.

For many, these old snaps function as a portal to bygone days – driving some to accuse the firm of "corporate greed" in messages on digital networks and negative feedback on digital storefronts.

Available Solutions

The company has likened its paid storage plans to those made available by Apple and Google for mobile devices.

And as an alternative for individuals avoiding fees, users have the ability to export their Memories – which for many people amount to significant data – to their personal gadget.

The company indicated that only a small number of users would be impacted by the new policy.

It also acknowledged that it was "never easy to transition from receiving a service for free to paying for it" – but implied it would be "justified by the benefits" for members.

Numerous criticising the move on the internet seem to disagree.

Public Outcry

A web-based protest dubbed the charge a "memory tax", with users labeling it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while a user vowed never to use the application again.

In parallel, in a one-star rating on the Google Play store, a person identifying as Natacha Jonsson said it felt "morally questionable".

"If I know millennials right, many people have a long history of recorded experiences on the platform," they wrote. "And most of us only continued using Snapchat mostly for that feature. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have extensive collections of recordings... Bye Snap."

Additionally, a journalism student, a 20-year-old journalism student in the UK capital, shared on a social network her intention to remove the platform.

"I made up my mind that I needed to download all my memories as soon as I could," she stated. "Almost all of my teenage years have been captured through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"It just doesn't make sense to demand payment individuals for something that has been complimentary for such a long time."

Unknown Fees

Snapchat has not disclosed how much subscription tiers would be priced at in the United Kingdom – only that they are part of a "gradual global rollout".

Yet 23-year-old Amber Daley, who also lives in London, said in a upload on the social platform that she would be "devastated" by the new costs.

The user noted that the service had become "a part of everyday life" since she began accessing it in 2014.

While she said she understood the platform needed to make money, Amber indicated that the archival function is more valuable than the firm may have anticipated.

"In my opinion it's quite an unfair move to impose fees on your users who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "This feature is more than a name, these are our real-life recollections."

Professional Insight

Firms deciding to charge from users for a function that was previously free is nothing new, and millions cover the cost of services like digital backup services to save their photos and videos from their handset.

The truth of archiving content in the cloud – which some in the tech industry like to refer to as simply "a remote system" – is that it costs money.

"Hosting trillions of saved content on the platform requires significant resources," social media consultant an industry analyst commented. "Snapchat has to attempt to identify a method to fund the operation of storage, bandwidth, duplicates, content delivery, security measures – all that stuff."

However the consultant noted that introducing fees for a service that had earlier required no payment, and users had been encouraged to use as such, may seem like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Moving the goalposts after people have accumulated this extensive stored content doesn't really sit right," he explained. And for many, he continued, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're sentimental records."

The feeling was shared by those leaving unfavorable comments, with one person calling their saved images and clips "deeply important to me".

"These archives contain every aspect of my experiences within them from celebrations of new family members' births, grieving for lost relatives, times spent with loved ones, [and] my entire youth," they wrote.

Academic Insight

A postdoctoral researcher, a research fellow at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, stated that Snapchat's move demonstrates the implications of commercial platforms being used to archive sentimental personal content.

"Platforms gain from this reliance, connected relationship, and assumption of perpetual availability, which even motivates certain individuals to remain with the platform or persist with the feature in order to review their saved content," she told the media. "Yet these are not benevolent guardians of individual recollection."